But What Is
Subud?
Click this link to read the PDF VERSION of
this article
Click this link to SEND FEEDBACK on the article
Click this link to VIEW FEEDBACK on the author's articles
What would you think if someone described Subud to you
like this?
Subud is one of many spiritual practices
originating from Indonesia. We call the founder ‘father’ and his successor,
‘mother’, and refer to each other as ‘brothers and sisters’.
We often ask Father or Mother to give us and
our children names, sometimes more than once. We have a penchant for Moslem
names, and like to adopt Islamic practices. We commonly use Indonesian words
and customs in our community life.
Although accurate, this is not usually the way we
explain Subud. I’ve often heard Subud described to applicants by what it isn't, rather than by what it actually is: it isn’t
a religion, but embraces all religions; there is no dogma; it’s not a cult; it
doesn’t have a guru; it’s not exclusive, and is available to everyone; and it’s
not like any other practice—the latihan is unique.
Let’s look at what each of these ‘isn’t’s actually
means, before distancing ourselves from them.
Religion—a
belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a God or
gods.
Dogma—a
principal or set of principals laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly
true.
Cult—a
system of religious veneration and devotion directed towards a particular
figure or object.
Guru—a
spiritual teacher.
While I am not suggesting we promote Subud as a cult
or religion, it certainly looks
as if it qualifies for all of the above; don’t we worship God, adhere to
certain understandings and principals we believe to be true, and venerate Bapak
and Ibu Rahayu, who are the spiritual teachers?
And how is Subud open to everyone? Surely we must
reject Buddhists if we believe that practising meditation and doing the latihan
would be ‘mixing’. And Taoists and Hindus—as the former don’t believe in God
and the latter believe in many.
And what is our position on gay people? Bapak said
homosexuality is unnatural and much more besides, so how can Subud be inclusive
if we are in reality homophobic?
Hundred of millions of people engage in spiritual
practice. For many, the purpose is connection to a higher power, getting in
touch with their inner selves, and being more aware in their daily lives. So
are we really unique in our Subud practice? (And why is this important, I
wonder.)
There is a glaring mismatch between what we profess to
be, and how we actually behave. There is a lack of integrity here, and it
bothers me. And I’m not alone. Many of my contemporaries, Subud kids now in our
thirties, forties and fifties, and also our children’s generation, have grown
up with this contradiction. Subud is part of who we are, whether we are active
or not. It is a valuable part of our life and experience, but it’s not all our life, as it was for many of our parents. So Subud
is ‘apart’, separated from other aspects of life. Why? For me it’s been because
it just seems too odd, it sounds
like something I wouldn’t want to be involved in.
An interesting way to look at this is by using the
psychological concepts of ‘rules’ and
‘norms’. All groups, from our families to our workplaces, have two sets of
rules: the overt ones, which are openly expressed, and the covert rules, called
‘norms’. Norms are the powerful, often unspoken conventions by which a group
operates. These naturally emerge from a group’s history, patterns of behaviour
and the dynamic way it develops. Norms are adhered to, consciously or
unconsciously, in order to belong.
In Subud it can be unclear what is a ‘rule’ and what
is a ‘norm’, since one of our norms is to say there are no rules!
I would say that Subud’s overt rules include:
· being
17+ years old before being opened
· separate
latihans for men and women
· testing
candidates for committee roles and
· following
one’s own experience in the latihan.
I suggest some of our norms are:
· the
latihan is superior to other spiritual practices
· thinking
is inferior to feeling
· accept
all that Bapak said, and
· don’t
question too much
Sometimes rules and norms clash; how do you ‘follow
your own receiving and experience’ and also accept what ‘Bapak said’ if these
things are at odds?
And what about belief in God, isn’t this actually a
rule? The opening statement that applicants read at their opening begins: ‘I believe in the One Almighty God, and I wish to
worship only God’.
Much of what Subud is today results from the time and
place of its origin, and the culture and religion associated with that time and
place. There is no mystery about this, except perhaps a denial that this is so.
Here is a simple example. We are all familiar with the Indonesian greeting, ‘Saudara Saudara’, meaning ‘Brothers and Sisters’.
But this is also a term used to address any group; it’s a way of saying ‘Ladies
and Gentlemen’. I wonder how that translation would have altered our Subud
culture.
My teenage years were spent in Cilandak in the 1970s,
so I can differentiate somewhat between Indonesian culture, Javanese tradition,
and Islamic custom.
The Javanese language has three, separate
vocabularies. Which one is used depends on whether you are speaking up to
higher-status people, down to lower-status people, or to an equal. Javanese
culture is infused with hierarchy; the seven levels, higher and lower forces
etc. all reflect this perspective. This particular understanding has been
accepted in Subud as fact, because Bapak explained things through his cultural
lens. But how does this fit with our very different backgrounds and
world-views?
As a young adult, when I left Jakarta and visited a
few Subud groups outside of Indonesia, I was surprised by all the batik, the
long skirts, gamelan music, and banana fasts. It was a weird culture shock; I
hadn’t expected Subud to be so entangled with Indonesian culture and Islam.
This is not to say we can’t adopt foreign habits and
rituals that resonate with us; I’m just uncomfortable when they become
synonymous with Subud. At the Innsbruck Congress, I was delighted to see wine
and salami being served in the foyer, something most unlikely to happen at
Subud gatherings in wine-drinking, pork-eating Australia or New Zealand.
Talking about this article over dinner recently, my
daughter coined the term ‘Sublam’, which goes to show how a sixteen-year-old
Australian views Subud as merged with Islam.
Subud has an ageing and shrinking population, and I
suspect this is largely because it is not very user-friendly and has a serious image problem. For Subud to be
more accessible, let’s recognise that we can genuinely move beyond the
Indonesian, Islamic prism of the ’60s and ’70s.
Subud doesn’t need protecting. We are Subud; we can question and change what supports who
we are, and drop what doesn’t. We can become more relevant and connected to the
place and times we live in, and to the wider community.
Personally I’m much more interested in understanding
what unites us with everyone else,
rather than what separates us.
Many good things in Subud are happening in this
direction, but let’s also find a way of expressing what Subud actually is that
is congruent with who we are.
Every person will find for himself or herself
the right way towards God, and what might be the right way for one may be
completely wrong for another. Therefore, you must discover your own self, and
develop your inner self. You must not follow or imitate anyone else.
—Bapak Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo